String Theory Discussion Forum
[ String Theory Home ] [ Forum Index ]

Re: Ramanujan, Physics, Hidden Knowledge

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Supersymmetry IV ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Ramanujan12 on September 25, 2003 at 03:49:14:

In Reply to: Re: How Does One go From the 4th Dimension to the Fifth? posted by sol on September 23, 2003 at 21:45:38:

"What if Srinivasa Ramanujan was able to pull his information from the fifth dimension, what would that mean and where is that?" -Sol

I have not read this book you mention on Quantum Gravity but will search on amazon for it. I deffinently see a need to encompass all geometries as you mention as well as the rendering of these geometries into a new mathematical language. In application to these formulas and written postulates to physics I think we haven't uncovered enough about the laws of physics nor biology enough for practical applications just yet. This work may be something to archive. I think some of it may be usefull now but most of it may be a century or two away from having application. Of course it could be used at this time our discourses have yet evolved to the point of having "n-degrees of freedom" syntactically and metaphysically we are still in a "3-degree of freedom" system of thought.

I am happy you discovered the drawings there :d. Many people liken them to alien civillizations, DMT "trippy stuff".....lol. But this is correct. Also correct is the possibility of their languages, and the images, for physics applications. These images are remotely sensed interdimensional, multidimensional, and hyperdimensional, as well as omnidimensional graphs. One of my friends asked me the other day "man you still awake......still graphin it eh?" The symbols work as semiotic elements of the whole, the set, being the color and morphology as an essence in the template or graph. Also as a catalog, a self-indexing and self-documenting archive for the future, say the year 2199. Translation is something I am asked most frequently and I tell people it can't be done. However as a conversion chart , like say as a celestial reference frame for points, by doing the probability or the recurence math for these graphs, that's an idea.

For the future of academic discourse, say arround 2100, I see the emergence of physics, mathematics, topology, art, and philosophy as one whole department. Also to note is the TOE should not be permitted in an understandable language yet lest we make of the whole universe what Einsteins E=Mc2, via Los Alamos RL, made of Hiroshima (and the Roswell event). We can't fit anymore aliens into our space-time fabric, nor would we want to ie. it's nice to have the space-time continuum in one piece.

As a theorist I think these equations, ideas, and templates will be appreciable but not until industrial interests unify with ecological interests; the years when we start building dome cities, teraforming, and the unification of creative thought with industrial and mathematical architecture.

In a way the future is much like a forward-escape into the past, into simplification in the right areas and complexification in the right areas. For now we have only over-complexified the things that should be simple and over-simplified the things that should be complex.

I found an interesting post on Ramanujans life concerning the Lotto and Good Will Hunting

http://dimacs.rutgers.edu/drei/mailing-archive/96/0702.html

Ramanujan is a huge inspiration in many ways and I am certain he received his information from the 8th-dimension? or higher? I have found much similarity between his life and my own. Ramanujan spent years studying this one complex math text he discovered (someone in the physics forum posted about this). This is interesting because I have done the same; there is this very hidden mathematical text that I luckily discovered at a used bookstore in 1996. The book is a Springer-Verlag monograph from 1970 called Derivation and Martingales by C.A. Hayes and C.Y. Pauc. The book can't be found on amazon but is available here

http://www.alibris.com/search/search.cfm

Anyway the mathematics in this book, most of the concepts, cannot be found anywhere else except in coveted journals from the Annals of Mathematics

http://www.math.princeton.edu/~annals/

The 8-pointed star symbol on their website is an occult representation for the "secret polyhedron", namely the 8-star-pointed regular polytope called the Stellated Truncated Octahedron STO. This polytope is basically like a star tetrahedron (Merkabah/stellated octahedron) except it is truncated first (Inclusive of Platonic, Archimidean and Keplerian geometry), whereas the Merkabah discards the Archimidean. Anyway the polytope itself is not refferenced anywhere and is basically secret, except to jewlers, even though it is one of the fundamental regular polyhedra. No databases contain this solid. If you were to understand the squares, roots, cells, and algorithms for this form, you would be able to do magic; the hidden geometry of the STO is used by illuminati circles for 3D Talisman magic.

I am currently cracking the codes of this STO and using the derivates, star blankets, and cell functions from this remote book to unvover the mathematics of the STO for something. What that something is I have yet to fully understand.

I appreciate your collaberation Sol and am looking forward to your opinions on this matter.

Ramanujan12




(Report this post to the moderator)

Follow Ups: (Reload page to see most recent)


Post a Followup

Name    :     (Save your login cookie)
Password  :     (Delete your login cookie)
Subject : 

Comments:


(The following are optional.)

Link URL   : 
Link Title : 
Image URL  :

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Supersymmetry IV ] [ FAQ ]