Re: Quantum Evolution(Spin wave Technologies)

Posted by sol on June 25, 2003 at 20:09:16:

In Reply to: Re: Quantum Evolution(Spin wave Technologies) posted by DocN on June 25, 2003 at 14:34:20:

DocN,

Truly, you never cease to amaze me:)

This link is a simple exercise in understanding something, about the level to which dimension can be referred, and here in the views, I speak about Gauss and Faraday and Maxwell. Einstein included all three, for obvious reasons:)

The function of the metric is specific about distance.

How would we understand that difference had we not moved our considerations to area above two people talking? Has it become more complex in chaotic understanding, that we can now see and understanding the hyperdimensional relevances , as we are being shown in this site?

Okay, so what use on a computational level could we have ever discerned the capabiltity of the Friedmann equation?

Part of the language development of LIGO and LISA, will be the undertsanding of the uniquensss of the various stages(fields) you have demonstrated by bringing this link for consideration.

The last post I have in the gravitational field(engaging the field)speaks to this understandng of mapping the moon, its gravitatinal field, and how would this take place?

I'll stop for now Doc, but I hope the significance is understood when we engage that field articulation, as it has been in this website. I give highmarks to the developer.

Much to consider here and palette of experience although simple in the drawings is very good.

The monopole consideration, would have been specific in the spin rotation. How would they measure the gravity field?

Mooreglade will see its significance immediately:)

Sol

(Report this post to the moderator)

Follow Ups: (Reload page to see most recent)

• Re: Quantum Evolution(Spin wave Technologies) -- DocN 6/26/03 (5)
  • Dr. Bohm's viewpoint -- DocN 6/29/03 (4)
    • Re: Dr. Bohm's viewpoint -- sol 6/30/03 (1)
      • One Droplet, now a stream? -- sol 6/30/03 (0)
    • Re: Dr. Bohm's viewpoint -- DickT 6/29/03 (1)
      • Dr. Dyson's veiwpoint -- DocN 6/30/03 (0)

Post a Followup