My BASIC unit triangles have no "altitudes"

Posted by MaddenL3 on October 13, 2002 at 10:15:27:

In Reply to: Talking in circles? posted by DickT on October 12, 2002 at 13:40:28:

Distance (separation) only exists from vertex to vertex, not to any "point" on the basic units of distance. In other words my basic unit line segments are not composed of "points". As you can see I am strictly ~CH and reject the idea of infinitesimals. Each basic unit triangle is a basic unit "plane", and each basic unit tetrahedron is a basic unit of "space".

What I find especially interesting is that when you start putting these together in a sort of "Tetrahedronal Coordinate System (T.C.S)", they do not fit together in any symmetric fashion. This may account for asymmetries we find in our physical world, where classical mathematics models would predict symmetry.

(Report this post to the moderator)

Follow Ups: (Reload page to see most recent)

• How Do Your Perceptions Sit with-- -- sol 10/14/02 (6)
  • Re: How Do Your Perceptions Sit with-- -- MaddenL3 10/15/02 (4)
    • Re: How Do Your Perceptions Sit with-- -- sol 10/15/02 (3)
      • Need some technical help -- MaddenL3 10/15/02 (2)
        • Re: Need some technical help -- sol 10/16/02 (1)
          • Calabi Yau, to me, looks like -- MaddenL3 10/18/02 (0)
  • Link Energy Plot -- sol 10/14/02 (0)

Post a Followup