Re: The Continuum Hypothesis

Posted by sol on September 13, 2002 at 20:42:22:

In Reply to: Re: The Continuum Hypothesis posted by mathman on September 13, 2002 at 20:39:57:

Mathman,

I believe, this is where you are wrong:)Thanks anyway:)

Sol

(Report this post to the moderator)

Follow Ups: (Reload page to see most recent)

• Re: The Continuum Hypothesis, Not! -- DickT 9/14/02 (12)
  • Re: The Continuum Hypothesis, Not! -- mathman 9/14/02 (5)
    • Re: The Continuum Hypothesis, Not! -- sol 9/16/02 (3)
      • Re: The Continuum Hypothesis, Not! -- DickT 9/17/02 (2)
        • Re: The Continuum Hypothesis, (Pure Energy?) -- sol 9/17/02 (1)
          • Symmetry = Pure Energy? -- sol 9/17/02 (0)
    • Re: The Continuum Hypothesis, Not! -- DickT 9/15/02 (0)
  • Background and no background? -- sol 9/14/02 (5)
    • Re: Background and no background? -- DickT 9/14/02 (4)
      • Re: Background and no background? -- sol 9/14/02 (3)
        • Re: Background and no background? -- DickT 9/15/02 (2)
          • Planck Scale? -- sol 9/15/02 (1)
            • c1) Nano Planck Scale: Each String / particle is an Universe & Web of the Cosmos -- kx21 9/15/02 (0)
• Continuum? As Best as I Can Describe it? -- sol 9/13/02 (1)
  • c2) Can energy vibrate without the Matter / Mass? -- kx21 9/15/02 (0)

Post a Followup