Re: Nothing Can Move in Spacetime

Posted by sol on April 21, 19101 at 23:22:42:

In Reply to: Re: Nothing Can Move in Spacetime posted by Nemesis on April 21, 19101 at 21:40:38:

The light cone. On the one hand we see the collapse to singularity. On the other hand we see the descriptive relevance of the blackhole. Minkowski had descriptive way of seeing this action and collapse in spacetime. This collapse was immediate and simultaneous with the idea of this hole being a doorway in to a three dimensional framework. The idea of the collapse, and the transition into a three dimensional world, was like a point on that Mobius strip. The Klein bottle was a unique way in which to translate this action.

I had once talked about the Taoist Calabi Yau, as a symbol of this action and its relevance in the world today. It was a way of understanding the dynamics of this energy to matter. Without time, there is no way to describe this action. The point zero, is a moment in time. That point is on that mobius strip. That point, is in Time. How could it not be in motion?

The talk about entanglement and the idea that information is not tranfered, though describing opposite actions over distance, creates the setting for this idea of past and future. Why?

I am very new to these ideas, and I have been learning, so if the framework is not as you say, can you explain why the points raised might not have no relevance?

Follow Ups: (Reload page to see most recent)

• Re: Nothing Can Move in Spacetime Nemesis 4/23/101 (2)
  • Re: Nothing Can Move in Spacetime sol 4/23/101 (1)
    • Re: Nothing Can Move in Spacetime Nemesis 4/24/101 (0)
• Re: Nothing Can Move in Spacetime sol 4/22/101 (0)

Post a Followup

Name    : 
Password  : 
Subject : 

Comments:

(The following are optional.)
Link URL   : 
Link Title : 
Image URL  :