Re: Your simple proof is lame.

Posted by Nemesis on April 10, 19101 at 19:15:07:

In Reply to: Your simple proof is lame. posted by James on April 10, 19101 at 18:58:49:

James wrote:

> Don't tell us the math of relativity supports your proof.
> ct=tmeters. You may not like to use this tool to do
> physics but thats your problem.

How does using a mathemnatical tool that changes seconds into meters prove that there is motion in spacetime and time travel, pray tell? It's either you are using a spatial dimension or a time dimension. You can't have your cake and eat it too. Although I'm sure you will. I am under no delusion and it is obvious that the current regime will not be overthrown without a Kuhniam revolution.

Nemesis

• Notorious Time Travel Crackpots

Follow Ups: (Reload page to see most recent)

• Your the one who made this claim. James 4/10/101 (12)
  • It is not my claim and it is true Nemesis 4/10/101 (11)
    • Intellectual honesty? James 4/10/101 (10)
      • Truth waits for no fool and serves no master Nemesis 4/10/101 (9)
        • You've reduced this.. James 4/10/101 (8)
          • Re: You've reduced this.. FireTag 4/11/101 (1)
            • Wow! Excellent Refutation Nemesis 4/11/101 (0)
          • Re: You've reduced this.. AlexG 4/11/101 (1)
            • Re: You've reduced this.. James 4/11/101 (0)
          • You say I'm full of BS Nemesis 4/10/101 (3)
            • The flaw in no motion conjecture Davesears1 4/11/101 (2)
              • Time Dilation is not time travel Nemesis 4/11/101 (1)
                • He isn't talking about time travel. James 4/11/101 (0)

Post a Followup

Name    : 
Password  : 
Subject : 

Comments:

(The following are optional.)
Link URL   : 
Link Title : 
Image URL  :