Your simple proof is lame.

Posted by James on April 10, 19101 at 18:58:49:

In Reply to: Re: Show us posted by Nemesis on April 10, 19101 at 18:40:22:

Don't tell us the math of relativity supports your proof. ct=t_meters. You may not like to use this tool to do physics but thats your problem.

Follow Ups: (Reload page to see most recent)

Re: Your simple proof is lame. Nemesis 4/10/101 (13)
- Your the one who made this claim. James 4/10/101 (12)
  - It is not my claim and it is true Nemesis 4/10/101 (11)
    - Intellectual honesty? James 4/10/101 (10)
      - Truth waits for no fool and serves no master Nemesis 4/10/101 (9)
        
        You've reduced this.. James 4/10/101 (8)
        
        Re: You've reduced this.. FireTag 4/11/101 (1)
        
        Wow! Excellent Refutation Nemesis 4/11/101 (0)
        
        Re: You've reduced this.. AlexG 4/11/101 (1)
        
        Re: You've reduced this.. James 4/11/101 (0)
        
        You say I'm full of BS Nemesis 4/10/101 (3)
        
        The flaw in no motion conjecture Davesears1 4/11/101 (2)
        
        Time Dilation is not time travel Nemesis 4/11/101 (1)
        
        He isn't talking about time travel. James 4/11/101 (0)

Name    : 
Password  : 
Subject : 

Comments:

(The following are optional.)
Link URL   : 
Link Title : 
Image URL  :