Re: dimensionality of mass part two

Posted by JohnCauthen on May 13, 2003 at 00:54:10:

In Reply to: dimensionality of mass part two posted by rtharbaugh on May 11, 2003 at 08:45:38:

Space itself is made of motionless matter. Space has weight, but it is not defined as weight unless it is in motion. To have mass it must travel from one point to the next. In doing so, it travels along one dimension through time. So you are right by my theory, mass must be two dimensional. If matter is just a point it has no quality of mass. It must move through time before it has mass.

The real key comes when going backwards in the logic. If mass must be two dimensional, then space itself can be massless matter that is not in motion.

And the massless matter that is not in motion is surrounded by energy. So there is a picture of space. It is like points of matter holding hands. You don't know the weight or tension until you test it. Testing it means it goes from being a one dimensional point with tension, to being in motion through time. So now think of a wave. A wave always moves through matter that is not in motion, or in a different motion from the wave, hence a point of mass is a wave.

(Report this post to the moderator)

Follow Ups: (Reload page to see most recent)

• Re: dimensionality of mass part two -- rtharbaugh 5/13/03 (1)
  • Re: dimensionality of mass part two -- JohnCauthen 5/13/03 (0)

Post a Followup

Name    :     (Save your login cookie)
Password  :     (Delete your login cookie)
Subject : 

Comments:

(The following are optional.)
Link URL   : 
Link Title : 
Image URL  :