Re: 2D, not real?

Posted by jfuhr on November 16, 19100 at 16:08:56:

In Reply to: 2D, not real? posted by the filthy_swine on November 16, 19100 at 05:00:04:

Elaborate, please. The problem, in my mind at least, is that in this world of 3D and when moving 4D objects, such things are tangible. This is the problem I find with 2D and 1D objects. They have to have zeromass and are only able to exist in a mathematical world. Assuming that all other 6 dimensions are of Plank size then it is not misconceiving that is the problem, for we are not misconceiving. Even though when getting this technical the different senses come into play. Sight is just a reflection, but feeling is tangibility. We can touch the 3D and 4D objects. Okay, I'm starting to repeat myself, so I'll stop now, but I don't completely understand what you're stating, please elaborate.

Follow Ups: (Reload page to see most recent)

Post a Followup

Name    : 
E-Mail  : 
Subject : 

Comments:

(The following are optional.)
Link URL   : 
Link Title : 
Image URL  :