Extra Dimensions II

• Idea - AlexanderS 4/22/101 (5)
  • Re: Idea - sol 4/22/101 (4)
    • Re: Idea - sol 4/22/101 (3)
      • Re: Idea - sol 4/22/101 (2)
        • Re: Idea - sol 4/22/101 (1)
          • Re: Idea - sol 4/22/101 (0)
• Possible contradiction in extra dimensions conjecture - Davesears1 4/11/101 (3)
  • Re: Possible contradiction in extra dimensions conjecture - phobos 4/11/101 (2)
    • Re: Possible contradiction in extra dimensions conjecture - Davesears1 4/11/101 (1)
      • Re: Possible contradiction in extra dimensions conjecture - phobos 4/11/101 (0)
• macroscopic dimensions - viper 4/06/101 (0)
• Nothing Can Move in Spacetime - Nemesis 4/05/101 (67)
  • Re: Nothing Can Move in Spacetime - ryojifurui 4/22/101 (0)
  • Re: Nothing Can Move in Spacetime - ReillyAtkinson 4/21/101 (15)
    • Re: Nothing Can Move in Spacetime - FireTag 4/21/101 (4)
      • Re: Nothing Can Move in Spacetime - DickT 4/22/101 (3)
        • Re: Nothing Can Move in Spacetime - Nemesis 4/22/101 (2)
          • Re: Nothing Can Move in Spacetime - varad 4/29/101 (0)
          • Re: Nothing Can Move in Spacetime - DickT 4/24/101 (0)
    • Re: Nothing Can Move in Spacetime - Nemesis 4/21/101 (9)
      • Re: Nothing Can Move in Spacetime - ReillyAtkinson 4/25/101 (1)
        • Re: Nothing Can Move in Spacetime - sol 4/25/101 (0)
      • Re: Nothing Can Move in Spacetime - sol 4/21/101 (6)
        • Re: Nothing Can Move in Spacetime - Nemesis 4/21/101 (5)
          • Re: Nothing Can Move in Spacetime - sol 4/21/101 (4)
            • Re: Nothing Can Move in Spacetime - Nemesis 4/23/101 (2)
              • Re: Nothing Can Move in Spacetime - sol 4/23/101 (1)
                • Re: Nothing Can Move in Spacetime - Nemesis 4/24/101 (0)
            • Re: Nothing Can Move in Spacetime - sol 4/22/101 (0)
  • Zeno's Paradox in Quantum Physics - DocN 4/08/101 (4)
    • Re: Zeno's Paradox in Quantum Physics - sol 4/08/101 (3)
      • Deutch Time Loop Model - DocN 4/09/101 (1)
        • Re: Deutch Time Loop Model - sol 4/09/101 (0)
      • Einstein and Zeno - DocN 4/09/101 (0)
  • Re: Nothing Can Move in Spacetime - Davesears1 4/06/101 (0)
  • Re: Nothing Can Move in Spacetime - AlexanderS 4/05/101 (43)
    • Re: Nothing Can Move in Spacetime - Davesears1 4/09/101 (3)
      • Re: Nothing Can Move in Spacetime - Nemesis 4/09/101 (2)
        • Re: Nothing Can Move in Spacetime - Davesears1 4/10/101 (1)
          • Re: Nothing Can Move in Spacetime - Nemesis 4/10/101 (0)
    • Re: Nothing Can Move in Spacetime - Nemesis 4/08/101 (38)
      • Time Machines and Zeno - DocN 4/09/101 (36)
        • Re: Time Machines and Zeno - Nemesis 4/09/101 (35)
          • black/white and gray thinking - DocN 4/10/101 (32)
            • Clear Thinking - Nemesis 4/10/101 (31)
              • BS - James 4/10/101 (13)
                • I have names and email addresses - Nemesis 4/10/101 (12)
                  • I know who is ignorant and its not me.. - James 4/10/101 (11)
                    • Think again - Nemesis 4/10/101 (10)
                      • Think again - James 4/10/101 (9)
                        • Somebody is rabid - Nemesis 4/10/101 (8)
                          • Re: Somebody is rabid - AlexG 4/11/101 (7)
                            • Don't just call me names. Refute! - Nemesis 4/11/101 (6)
                              • Re: Don't just call me names. Refute! - sol 4/11/101 (5)
                                • Nonlocality -> Nonspatiality - Nemesis 4/11/101 (4)
                                  • Re: Nonlocality -> Nonspatiality - Nemesis 4/11/101 (3)
                                    • Re: Nonlocality -> Nonspatiality - sol 4/12/101 (2)
                                      • Re: Nonlocality -> Nonspatiality - Nemesis 4/12/101 (1)
                                        • Re: Nonlocality -> Nonspatiality - sol 4/16/101 (0)
              • Show us - James 4/10/101 (16)
                • Re: Show us - Nemesis 4/10/101 (15)
                  • Your simple proof is lame. - James 4/10/101 (14)
                    • Re: Your simple proof is lame. - Nemesis 4/10/101 (13)
                      • Your the one who made this claim. - James 4/10/101 (12)
                        • It is not my claim and it is true - Nemesis 4/10/101 (11)
                          • Intellectual honesty? - James 4/10/101 (10)
                            • Truth waits for no fool and serves no master - Nemesis 4/10/101 (9)
                              • You've reduced this.. - James 4/10/101 (8)
                                • Re: You've reduced this.. - FireTag 4/11/101 (1)
                                  • Wow! Excellent Refutation - Nemesis 4/11/101 (0)
                                • Re: You've reduced this.. - AlexG 4/11/101 (1)
                                  • Re: You've reduced this.. - James 4/11/101 (0)
                                • You say I'm full of BS - Nemesis 4/10/101 (3)
                                  • The flaw in no motion conjecture - Davesears1 4/11/101 (2)
                                    • Time Dilation is not time travel - Nemesis 4/11/101 (1)
                                      • He isn't talking about time travel. - James 4/11/101 (0)
          • Re: Time Machines and Zeno - sol 4/09/101 (1)
            • Re: Time Machines and Zeno - Nemesis 4/09/101 (0)
      • Re: Nothing Can Move in Spacetime - sol 4/08/101 (0)
• Equation of a Gravitional Well (in GR) - AlexanderS 4/04/101 (3)
  • Re: Equation of a Gravitional Well (in GR) - phobos 4/04/101 (2)
    • Re: Equation of a Gravitional Well (in GR) - AlexanderS 4/05/101 (1)
      • Re: Equation of a Gravitional Well (in GR) - James 4/05/101 (0)
• Repulsive Gravity - Davesears1 4/03/101 (6)
  • Re: Repulsive Gravity - jsodemann 4/05/101 (0)
  • Re: Repulsive Gravity - phobos 4/03/101 (4)
    • Re: Repulsive Gravity - Davesears1 4/03/101 (3)
      • Re: Repulsive Gravity - phobos 4/03/101 (2)
        • Re: Repulsive Gravity - Davesears1 4/04/101 (1)
          • Re: Repulsive Gravity - viper 4/06/101 (0)
• An Experiment - jsodemann 3/21/101 (18)
  • Re: An Experiment - phobos 3/21/101 (16)
    • Re: An Experiment - moorglade 4/01/101 (0)
    • Re: An Experiment - jsodemann 3/22/101 (14)
      • Re: An Experiment - phobos 3/22/101 (13)
        • Re: An Experiment - jsodemann 3/22/101 (11)
          • Re: An Experiment - phobos 3/22/101 (10)
            • Re: An Experiment - jsodemann 3/23/101 (7)
              • Re: An Experiment - phobos 3/23/101 (6)
                • Re: An Experiment - jsodemann 4/02/101 (5)
                  • Re: An Experiment - phobos 4/02/101 (4)
                    • Re: An Experiment - jsodemann 4/05/101 (3)
                      • Re: An Experiment - phobos 4/06/101 (2)
                        • Re: An Experiment - jsodemann 4/09/101 (1)
                          • Re: An Experiment - phobos 4/09/101 (0)
            • Re: An Experiment - jsodemann 3/23/101 (1)
              • Re: An Experiment - erniesparks 3/23/101 (0)
        • Re: An Experiment - dr_syed_ameen2000 3/22/101 (0)
  • Re: An Experiment - dr_syed_ameen2000 3/21/101 (0)
• HYPERSURFACES,HYPERVOLUMES,GROUP THEORY & SYMMETRIES - dr_syed_ameen2000 3/20/101 (0)
• The one dimensional string - sol 3/17/101 (0)
• IS EXISTENCE OF ANTIGRAVITY PARTICLES POSSIBLE? - dr_syed_ameen2000 3/14/101 (3)
  • Re: IS EXISTENCE OF ANTIGRAVITY PARTICLES POSSIBLE? - Gordo 3/14/101 (2)
    • Re: IS EXISTENCE OF ANTIGRAVITY PARTICLES POSSIBLE? - dr_syed_ameen2000 3/21/101 (0)
    • Re: IS EXISTENCE OF ANTIGRAVITY PARTICLES POSSIBLE? - AlexanderS 3/16/101 (0)
• two types of dimensions - oker56 3/12/101 (37)
  • Re: two types of dimensions - quantumdot 3/22/101 (0)
  • Okay, here's the deal... - phobos 3/12/101 (35)
    • Re: Okay, here's the deal... - mtkelso 4/05/101 (2)
      • Re: Okay, here's the deal... - FireTag 4/05/101 (1)
        • Re: Okay, here's the deal... - mtkelso 4/07/101 (0)
    • Re: Okay, here's the deal... - mtkelso 3/16/101 (21)
      • Re: Okay, here's the deal... - FireTag 3/16/101 (20)
        • A temperature dimension - ReillyAtkinson 3/16/101 (4)
          • Re: A temperature dimension - FireTag 3/17/101 (3)
            • Re: A temperature dimension - syeger 3/19/101 (0)
            • Re: A temperature dimension - mtkelso 3/19/101 (1)
              • Re: A temperature dimension - FireTag 3/19/101 (0)
        • A temperature dimension - ReillyAtkinson 3/16/101 (14)
          • Re: A temperature dimension - phobos 3/16/101 (13)
            • Re: A temperature dimension - syeger 3/19/101 (0)
            • Re: A temperature dimension - mtkelso 3/16/101 (8)
              • Re: A temperature dimension - phobos 3/17/101 (6)
                • Re: A temperature dimension - mtkelso 3/19/101 (1)
                  • Re: A temperature dimension - phobos 3/19/101 (0)
                • Re: A temperature dimension - moorglade 3/18/101 (3)
                  • Re: A temperature dimension - phobos 3/18/101 (2)
                    • Ignore the previous post - phobos 3/18/101 (1)
                      • Re: Ignore the previous post - moorglade 3/18/101 (0)
              • Re: A temperature dimension - FireTag 3/17/101 (0)
            • Re: A temperature dimension - sol 3/16/101 (2)
              • Re: A temperature dimension - phobos 3/17/101 (1)
                • Re: A temperature dimension - sol 3/17/101 (0)
    • Re: Okay, here's the deal... - sol 3/13/101 (0)
    • Ha! Ha! #2 - erniesparks 3/13/101 (0)
    • Re: Okay, here's the deal... - erniesparks 3/13/101 (7)
      • Re: Okay, here's the deal... - FireTag 3/13/101 (6)
        • Re: Okay, here's the deal... - erniesparks 3/14/101 (5)
          • Re: Okay, here's the deal... - AlexanderS 3/15/101 (4)
            • Re: Okay, here's the deal... - sol 3/15/101 (3)
              • Re: Okay, here's the deal... - sol 3/15/101 (2)
                • Re: Okay, here's the deal... - sol 3/15/101 (1)
                  • Re: Okay, here's the deal... - sol 3/15/101 (0)
• Infinite dimensions - AlexanderS 3/09/101 (2)
  • Re: Infinite dimensions - DickT 3/10/101 (1)
    • Re: Infinite dimensions - phobos 3/11/101 (0)
• why aren't dimensions symmetric - mtkelso 3/06/101 (25)
  • Re: why aren't dimensions symmetric - phobos 3/07/101 (24)
    • Re: why aren't dimensions symmetric - mtkelso 3/12/101 (1)
      • Re: why aren't dimensions symmetric - FireTag 3/12/101 (0)
    • Re: why aren't dimensions symmetric - mtkelso 3/07/101 (21)
      • Back to symmetric dimensions - mtkelso 3/09/101 (4)
        • A bit more - mtkelso 3/10/101 (3)
          • While I'm at it... - mtkelso 3/12/101 (2)
            • Re: While I'm at it... - syeger 3/12/101 (0)
            • Re: While I'm at it... - moorglade 3/12/101 (0)
      • Re: why aren't dimensions symmetric - phobos 3/08/101 (6)
        • Re: why aren't dimensions symmetric - mtkelso 3/09/101 (5)
          • Re: why aren't dimensions symmetric - phobos 3/09/101 (4)
            • Re: why aren't dimensions symmetric - mtkelso 3/12/101 (3)
              • Re: why aren't dimensions symmetric - phobos 3/12/101 (2)
                • Re: why aren't dimensions symmetric - mtkelso 3/13/101 (1)
                  • Re: why aren't dimensions symmetric - phobos 3/13/101 (0)
      • Re: why aren't dimensions symmetric - FireTag 3/08/101 (8)
        • Re: why aren't dimensions symmetric - mtkelso 3/09/101 (5)
          • Re: why aren't dimensions symmetric - FireTag 3/09/101 (4)
            • Re: why aren't dimensions symmetric - mtkelso 3/09/101 (0)
            • Re: why aren't dimensions symmetric - erniesparks 3/09/101 (2)
              • Re: why aren't dimensions symmetric - FireTag 3/09/101 (1)
                • Re: why aren't dimensions symmetric - DickT 3/09/101 (0)
        • Re: why aren't dimensions symmetric - moorglade 3/08/101 (1)
          • Re: why aren't dimensions symmetric - FireTag 3/08/101 (0)
• How do extra dimensions exist? - em00guy 3/03/101 (3)
  • Re: How do extra dimensions exist? - FireTag 3/03/101 (2)
    • Re: How do extra dimensions exist? - moorglade 3/06/101 (1)
      • Re: How do extra dimensions exist? - sol 3/06/101 (0)
• any takers? - Quanta 2/25/101 (0)
• the physics of extra dimensions.. - Quanta 2/23/101 (1)
  • Re: the physics of extra dimensions.. - phobos 2/25/101 (0)
• extra dimensions are impossible to detect - enrique 2/22/101 (16)
  • Re: extra dimensions are impossible to detect - FireTag 2/22/101 (15)
    • Re: extra dimensions are impossible to detect - enrique 2/23/101 (14)
      • Re: extra dimensions are impossible to detect - FireTag 2/23/101 (13)
        • Re: extra dimensions are impossible to detect - Ortemus 3/02/101 (12)
          • Re: extra dimensions are impossible to detect - FireTag 3/03/101 (0)
          • Re: extra dimensions are impossible to detect - DickT 3/03/101 (10)
            • Re: extra dimensions are impossible to detect - varad 3/04/101 (9)
              • Re: extra dimensions are impossible to detect - FireTag 3/04/101 (8)
                • Re: extra dimensions are impossible to detect - sol 3/04/101 (7)
                  • Re: extra dimensions are impossible to detect - FireTag 3/05/101 (6)
                    • Re: extra dimensions are impossible to detect - syeger 3/05/101 (4)
                      • Re: extra dimensions are impossible to detect - syeger 3/05/101 (0)
                      • Re: extra dimensions are impossible to detect - syeger 3/05/101 (1)
                        • Re: extra dimensions are impossible to detect - sol 3/05/101 (0)
                      • Re: extra dimensions are impossible to detect - FireTag 3/05/101 (0)
                    • Re: extra dimensions are impossible to detect - sol 3/05/101 (0)
• Hierarchy problem - jfelix 2/15/101 (4)
  • Re: Hierarchy problem - phobos 2/15/101 (3)
    • Re: Hierarchy problem - jfelix 2/15/101 (2)
      • Re: Hierarchy problem - phobos 2/15/101 (1)
        • Re: Hierarchy problem - jfelix 2/16/101 (0)
• Extra dimensions & atomic orbits - Davesears1 2/15/101 (1)
  • Re: Extra dimensions & atomic orbits - phobos 2/15/101 (0)
• University Of Washington Physicists Find That Extra Dimensions Must Be Smaller Than 0.2 Millimeter - Ortemus 2/13/101 (0)
• one-over-f - ryojifurui 2/11/101 (0)
• erniesparks - varad 2/11/101 (3)
  • erniesparks here! - erniesparks 2/11/101 (2)
    • Re: erniesparks here! - varad 2/14/101 (0)
    • Re: erniesparks here! - varad 2/14/101 (0)
• Virtual Dimension - FrankGraphics 2/07/101 (24)
  • Re: Virtual Dimension - FrankGraphics 2/08/101 (16)
    • Re: Virtual Dimension - FireTag 2/09/101 (15)
      • Re: Virtual Dimension - FrankGraphics 2/10/101 (14)
        • Re: Virtual Dimension - FireTag 2/11/101 (0)
        • Re: Virtual Dimension - syeger 2/10/101 (1)
          • Re: Virtual Dimension - sol 2/11/101 (0)
        • Re: Virtual Dimension - FireTag 2/10/101 (10)
          • Re: Virtual Dimension - FrankGraphics 2/11/101 (2)
            • Re: Virtual Dimension - FireTag 2/11/101 (0)
            • Re: Virtual Dimension - FrankGraphics 2/11/101 (0)
          • Re: Virtual Dimension - FrankGraphics 2/10/101 (5)
            • Re: Virtual Dimension - FireTag 2/11/101 (3)
              • Re: Virtual Dimension - FrankGraphics 2/11/101 (2)
                • Re: Virtual Dimension - FireTag 2/11/101 (1)
                  • Re: Virtual Dimension - FrankGraphics 2/11/101 (0)
            • Re: Virtual Dimension - FrankGraphics 2/10/101 (0)
          • Re: Virtual Dimension - syeger 2/10/101 (0)
  • Re: Virtual Dimension - FireTag 2/07/101 (6)
    • Re: Virtual Dimension - Rogerdr 2/12/101 (2)
      • Re: Virtual Dimension - FireTag 2/13/101 (1)
        • Re: Virtual Dimension - Rogerdr 2/13/101 (0)
    • Re: Virtual Dimension - FrankGraphics 2/07/101 (1)
      • Re: Virtual Dimension - FrankGraphics 2/07/101 (0)
    • Re: Virtual Dimension - FrankGraphics 2/07/101 (0)
• Dimensional subjectivity - Emile 2/07/101 (2)
  • Re: Dimensional subjectivity - AlexG 2/07/101 (1)
    • Re: Dimensional subjectivity - syeger 2/10/101 (0)
• Infinite space in higher dimensions - Diego 1/22/101 (1)
  • Re: Infinite space in higher dimensions - FireTag 1/22/101 (0)
• why more spacial dimensions? - Enoch 1/10/101 (20)
  • Re: why more spacial dimensions? - FireTag 1/10/101 (19)
    • Re: why more spacial dimensions? - varad 1/13/101 (18)
      • Re: why more spacial dimensions? - FireTag 1/13/101 (17)
        • Re: why more spacial dimensions? - varad 1/13/101 (16)
          • Re: why more spacial dimensions? - FireTag 1/13/101 (15)
            • Re: why more spacial dimensions? - varad 1/14/101 (14)
              • Re: why more spacial dimensions? - syeger 1/14/101 (7)
                • Re: why more spacial dimensions? - varad 1/14/101 (6)
                  • last 7 - varad 1/14/101 (5)
                    • Re: last 7 - BlackDragon 1/18/101 (4)
                      • Re: last 7 - varad 1/19/101 (3)
                        • Re: last 7 - stephen 1/19/101 (0)
                        • Re: last 7 - BlackDragon 1/19/101 (1)
                          • Re: last 7 - James 1/20/101 (0)
              • Re: why more spacial dimensions? - FireTag 1/14/101 (5)
                • last 7 - varad 1/14/101 (0)
                • last 7 - varad 1/14/101 (0)
                • Re: why more spacial dimensions? - varad 1/14/101 (2)
                  • Re: why more spacial dimensions? - FireTag 1/17/101 (1)
                    • Re: why more spacial dimensions? - varad 1/19/101 (0)
• Response to message - Davesears1 1/08/101 (3)
  • Re: Response to message - FireTag 1/08/101 (2)
    • The wandering moon of Mars - AlexG 1/09/101 (1)
      • the wandering angel of CERN (or so i read) - djm 1/18/101 (0)
• Response to message - Davesears1 1/08/101 (0)
• Physics Strangeness - wortzman 1/05/101 (9)
  • Re: Physics Strangeness - syeger 1/07/101 (0)
  • Re: Physics Strangeness - AlexG 1/06/101 (7)
    • Re: Physics Strangeness - hulten 1/06/101 (0)
    • Re: Physics Strangeness - hulten 1/06/101 (5)
      • Re: Physics Strangeness - FireTag 1/06/101 (4)
        • Re: Physics Strangeness - DickT 1/07/101 (3)
          • Re: Physics Strangeness - FireTag 1/08/101 (0)
          • Re: Physics Strangeness - syeger 1/07/101 (1)
            • Re: Physics Strangeness - DickT 1/08/101 (0)

Post A Message!