membrane causality
Posted by pelastration on August 31, 2003 at 18:07:48:
As some of you know: membranes are essential to me.
My view is that a fundamental membrane - being unbreakable and almost
infinite elastic - can restructure itself in various holons (or islands) which
can generate sub-holons (which contain the previous hyperspaces), which
can generate other sub-holons, etc.
Basically it's a kinetic mechanism.
Since the membrane is unbreakable the penetration of active holons
through passive holons creates a new multi-layered unit. The result: local
multi-layered spacetime. (a preferred frame). But of course the relation
between and with outer holons is non-local.
Since the holons are just restructured membrane (spacetime) each holon is
in essence just a specific expression of gravity. Because everything
originates from the same basic membrane ... everything is connected with
each other by "membrane causality'. When a holon A has a certain
experience every other holon B, C(c), D[a(w)] ... may 'feel' indirect the
oscillations through the common membrane. Many parameters will depend
the range (stretchability of the brane, harmonic/disharmonic couplings,
embeddings, ...)
What happens locally? Since the total (overhaul) membrane system moves
(oscillates) all restructure sub-membranes inside each holon move too.
Each holon has several layers coupled together. These layers start to
interfere with each other. Interactions. Friction brings thermodynamics, EM,
radiation, ....
This means that by the overhaul kinetic movement of the total system all
holons start to have all type of interactions inside them. This brings us the
basics and the complexity of self-organization.
The preferred frame of a holon seems "independent" to observers or even
participants because they can only observe and measure with resonant
tools and senses. Since participants and the measuring tools are also
restructured gravitational membrane they will influence each experiment.
This brings us to strange effects as observed in for example the Alain
Aspect experiment.
What happens there?
We say that there is a holon ( a calcium atom X) which has a multi-layered
gravity structure containing excited electrons, nuclei, etc. The atom X
contains two photons A and B indirectly coupled with membrane parts Ta
and Tb.
Key is that the SAME ATOM (X) shoots the two photons (A)(B) to two
opposite polarizers Pa and Pb . But the two photons are still coupled to
gravitational membrane parts (Ta and Tb) of the atom. The polarizers Pa
and Pb are put into the crossed position of the emission. Now the two
photons A and B have an identical structural angle with the gravity
transport membrane Ta and Tb of the atom because they are emitted at
the same moment by the atom. Yet one of the photons B can not pass the
polarizer Pb, although A passes Pa. Why not? Because the vehicle
membrane Tb that transports B has a wrong angle to Pb. On the moment
Tb (bringing B) senses the structural barrier of Pb he drops photon B. Now
B is absorbed into or coupled with the gravity membrane of Pb and heats
up polarizer Pb.
Essential in this hypothesis is that the the emission by the atom happens at
the 'same moment'. There must be some angle-constant (time/angle)
between Ta and Tb.
Cfr. on multiple EPR experiments: Thus a collection of electrons (sent of time x) has another "spin By this simple hypothesis it is not necessary to explain such events by a BIT By looking to spacetime as mechanical interpenetrating gravity layers we As an inventor I am only interested in 'basics and processes' that really can This brings us to some religious concepts. In Buddhism we find reference http://www.rep.routledge.com/article/G002SECT8 : "This form of We see the need to explain "interconnectedness" not only in religion but As Stuart Kauffman wrote (At home in the Universe): "Catalystic closure By his normal senses the Macaque ape has a perception of his surrounding: Dirk. Follow Ups: (Reload page to see most recent)
There is another objection to the experimental tests that, at least so far,
nobody has managed to get totally around. We measure a spin
combination of, say, zero degrees and 45 degrees for a collection of
electrons and then measure another spin combination, say 45 degrees and
90 degrees, for another collection of electrons. In our classroom example,
this is sort of like measuring the number of men students whose height is
not over 5' 8" in one class, and then using another class of different
students to measure the number of students whose height is over 5' 8" but
do not have blue eyes. The difference is that a collection of, say, a billion
electrons from the source in the correlation experiments always behaves
identically within small and expected statistical fluctuations with every
other collection of a billion electrons from the source. Since that fact has
been verified many many times for all experiments of all types, we assume
it is true when we are doing these correlation experiments. This
assumption is an example of inductive logic; of course we assumed the
validity of logic in our derivation." - end of quote.
combination" than another collection of electrons (sent at time y).
(back-in-time effect like IBM/Sarfatti proposed - < http://
www.qedcorp.com/pcr/pcr/epr.pdf >, without falling back on
instantaneous voodoo-style links between photons/electrons, or accepting
completely randomly correlations in time and in polarization. There can be
a logic system behind that is based on specific dynamics of changing
spacetime layers.
can find new directions.
The advantage of this one-postulate-based-approach is that it's is
conform to E's spacetime curvature. (cfr. Patricia's: http://
www.theory.caltech.edu/people/patricia/greltop.html with the three first
pdf-file on my website: http://www.mu6.com/pdf.html ). We can see also
that local and non-locality can be united through membrane causality.
be build. Therefor there can NOT be uncertainty in the concept. It works or
it works not. Uncertainty in the measuring: OK. That's normal. When you
make an injection- mould you have limits. In deistic terms: We may not
project our own ignorance on God. He knows. We don't.
to the universal womb in the Lankavatara Sutra ( ) , but also to the
universal order of succession (cfr. Implicate Order of Bohm) in the
Buddhist taught of the laws of Pratitya Samutpada (the ‘principle of
conditioned co-production’) (http://www.fwbo.org/articles/
buddhism&environment.html) and The Emptiness (Sunyata) (http://
www.purifymind.com/SunyataEmp.htm ).
nondualism is not monistic because shishi wu’ai does not obliterate the
distinctions between things, but rather insists that everything is connected
to everything else without losing distinctiveness. Identity and difference, in
this view, are merely two sides of the same coin, which, though a single
coin, still has two distinct sides that should not be confused for each other.
Mutual interpenetration is temporal as well as spatial; past, present and
future mutually interpenetrate. Hence according to Huayan, to enter the
path towards final enlightenment is, in an important sense, to have already
arrived at that destination."
also in Bohm, in Nick Herbert, in Einstein, in Peat, in Wheeler, in Pribram, in
Koestler, in Jung, in Vigier, ... it seems in most humans. ;-)
ensures that the whole exists by means of the parts ... Autocatalystic sets
exhibit the emergent power of holism."
About above image:
The part of the Macaque Cortex of the above image comes from Shawn of
the http://www.mind-brain.com forum.
The Macaque Cortex shows an organization of physical 'nerves'. But since
we see the underlying structure of nerves molecules (holons) as each
containing founding Gravity-membrane layers there is also information
transfer possible by these layers. Excitation of layers can happens in three
ways:
(1) exogenous information: other holons can arrive and have a surface
contact with the specific holon, and his membranes start to co-vibrate. By
this vibration internal membrane will start to co-vibrate also. Such
excitation may create the conditions that oscillating peaks 'couple' in a
knot. This knot can be very temporary but may also be really long-lasting
(memory) when there is a 'pelastration' (that's a penetration where several
layers are bound in a new entity.). So that new unity (containing joined
duality) has a unique combination of oscillations: a unique resonance.
That's unique INFORMATION. When the outer - provoking holon
disappears: the knowledge-knot is still there!
In our brain we will have collectors of "resonance" who will just 'mirror'
such knowledge knot and transport that surface-stamp to another units,
and stamp there again (that way reproducing the identical information in
the receptor). Such mediators can be the neurotransmitters.
(2) Internal excitation: because the overhaul system vibrates and kinetically
moves, all sub-sets will have internally friction between the internal layers.
Friction means: thermodynamics, Electro-magnetism and nuclear
interaction; Thus: by the internal movement also new knots can be made
(IF the stretchability of the internal membrane(s) allow so. Most of the time:
membrane moves will not lead to new information knots. Knowledge knots
will be 'rare events'.
(3) Embedded information: external information may also ENTER inside a
holon, and staying there. That will influence the holon's oscillation. This
holon will start to vibrate differently.
(4) Changes in the previous (parent) layers of the holon will create co-
vibrations inside the holon. This is real non-local communication. Longer
and less intensive oscillations. When the brain is very active (i.e. Beta-
waves) such subtile vibrations will not be observed. But when the over-
powering brain-waves go at rest (sleep) the vibrations of the lower levels
will become active and present themselves in the form of dreams with
individual subconsciousness " information knots" and also lower
archetypical "collective subconsciousness knots". ESP connections can
happen also this way.
his trees, his food, the wood, the lake, the man. But when he learns
suddenly something new - a new insight or handling - it may come by the
membrane causality/connectivity: Sheldrake's morphic fields.
(Report this post to the moderator)